- BOOK REVIEW: Maps, tables, notes, index
- BOOK REVIEW: Maps, tables, notes, index
- LEADERSHIP: A Chinese Middle East
- MYANMAR: Myanmar October 2025 Update
- MALI: Mali October 2025 Update
- PARAMILITARY: Pay For Slay Forever
- PHOTO: Javelin Launch at Resolute Dragon
- FORCES: North Koreans Still in Ukraine
- MORALE: Americans Killed by Israelis
- PHOTO: SGT STOUT Air Defense
- YEMEN: Yemen October 2025 Update
- PHOTO: Coming Home to the Nest
- BOOK REVIEW: "No One Wants to be the Last to Die": The Battles of Appomattox, April 8-9, 1865
- SUPPORT: Late 20th Century US Military Education
- PHOTO: Old School, New School
- ON POINT: Trump To Generals: America Confronts Invasion From Within
- SPECIAL OPERATIONS: New Israeli Special Operations Forces
- PHOTO: Marine Training in the Carribean
- FORCES: NATO Versus Russia Showdown
- PHOTO: Bombing Run
- ATTRITION: Ukrainian Drone Shortage
- NBC WEAPONS: Russia Resorts to Chemical Warfare
- PARAMILITARY: Criminals Control Russia Ukraine Border
- SUBMARINES: Russia Gets Another SSBN
- BOOK REVIEW: The Roman Provinces, 300 BCE–300 CE: Using Coins as Sources
- PHOTO: Ghost-X
- ARMOR: Poland Has The Largest Tank Force in Europe
- AIR WEAPONS: American Drone Debacle
- INFANTRY: U.S. Army Moves To Mobile Brigade Combat Teams
- PHOTO: Stalker
Throughout the 1990s, the U.S. air force moved towards a new style of bombing. Obsessed with avoiding losses to ground fire, bombing was done from 15,000 feet. This kept aircraft out of range of anti-aircraft guns and portable heat seeking missiles. Longer range missiles were avoided using extensive electronic warfare efforts. But there was one major problem that no improvements in guided bombs and sensors could overcome; you had a hard time hitting anything from that far up. Moreover, operating that high made it easier for the enemy on the ground to use deception. This was seen with embarrassing effect when NATO ground troops moved into Kosovo in 1999 and found only a handful of destroyed armored vehicles. The NATO air forces had claimed hundreds of vehicles destroyed. Many air force officers now admit there is a problem and are looking hard at solutions. The most painful solution is to depend on countermeasures for portable and low altitude missiles. Aircraft would then be able to go in low and hit real targets, not decoys. Other solutions include better high altitude sensors, but so far this approach has consistently failed.